Williams v. Parham

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 2009
Docket08-8604
StatusUnpublished

This text of Williams v. Parham (Williams v. Parham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Parham, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8604

BRANDON WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PARHAM, Captain; BEAMAN, Ms.; L.T.; SCOTT, Ms.; L.T.; D. SIMONS, Superintendent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00938-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brandon Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brandon Williams appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without

prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. On appeal, we

confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Williams’ brief alleges no error

committed by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the

order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams v. Parham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-parham-ca4-2009.