Williams v. Parham
This text of Williams v. Parham (Williams v. Parham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8604
BRANDON WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PARHAM, Captain; BEAMAN, Ms.; L.T.; SCOTT, Ms.; L.T.; D. SIMONS, Superintendent,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00938-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 18, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brandon Williams appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without
prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. On appeal, we
confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s
brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Williams’ brief alleges no error
committed by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the
order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williams v. Parham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-parham-ca4-2009.