Williams v. Overholser

D.C. Circuit

Williams v. Overholser

151 F.2d 457, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 235

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1945

DocketNo. 8938

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 151 F.2d 457 (Williams v. Overholser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Overholser, 151 F.2d 457, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 235 (D.C. Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner alleges in' his petition for the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus that “he is now being illegally imprisoned” by respondent, who is superintendent of a hospital for the insane. The record shows that the superintendent is holding petitioner by virtue of a commitment issued out of the trial court February 1, 1935. The writ issued, and, after issue was joined in the usual manner, evidence was introduced. The trial court found that the insanity theretofore adjudged continued and dismissed the writ. Petitioner appealed, and Mr. P. Michael Cook, an attorney appointed by the court and acting without compensation, ably presented petitioner’s points.

It appears that the commitment under which petitioner was received by respondent and under which he is now held is legal and regular in every way. It appears further that petitioner took the stand and testified that he is of sound mind. Other competent testimony was received to the effect that he is of unsound mind. This court cannot disturb the trial court’s conclusions as to petitioner’s mental condition in these circumstances.

Petitioner states that the “jury who served in the case * * * had intentions to declare petitioner insane before the date of trial Feb. 1st, 1935, due to having been given false information about petitioner by parties desiring petitioner’s confinement for selfish reasons acting through Collusion and Conspiracy.” These are conclusions unsupported by allegations of fact.

It is set out that certain hospital records bearing statements concerning a shooting in a Maine hospital were admitted at the hearing. They were official records properly admitted, and no fact is alleged that these reached the jury in any other way than as evidence in the case.

The petition reveals the fact that petitioner is laboring under the delusion that he has been convicted of a capital offense without due process of law. He was convicted of no offense on February 1, 1935, but was found to be insane.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner alleges in' his petition for the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus that “he is now being illegally imprisoned” by respondent, who is superintendent of a hospital for the insane. The record shows that the superintendent is holding petitioner by virtue of a commitment issued out of the trial court February 1, 1935. The writ issued, and, after issue was joined in the usual manner, evidence was introduced. The trial court found that the insanity theretofore adjudged continued and dismissed the writ. Petitioner appealed, and Mr. P. Michael Cook, an attorney appointed by the court and acting without compensation, ably presented petitioner’s points.

It appears that the commitment under which petitioner was received by respondent and under which he is now held is legal and regular in every way. It appears further that petitioner took the stand and testified that he is of sound mind. Other competent testimony was received to the effect that he is of unsound mind. This court cannot disturb the trial court’s conclusions as to petitioner’s mental condition in these circumstances.

Petitioner states that the “jury who served in the case * * * had intentions to declare petitioner insane before the date of trial Feb. 1st, 1935, due to having been given false information about petitioner by parties desiring petitioner’s confinement for selfish reasons acting through Collusion and Conspiracy.” These are conclusions unsupported by allegations of fact.

It is set out that certain hospital records bearing statements concerning a shooting in a Maine hospital were admitted at the hearing. They were official records properly admitted, and no fact is alleged that these reached the jury in any other way than as evidence in the case.

The petition reveals the fact that petitioner is laboring under the delusion that he has been convicted of a capital offense without due process of law. He was convicted of no offense on February 1, 1935, but was found to be insane.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 F.2d 457, 80 U.S. App. D.C. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-overholser-cadc-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack