Williams v. Overcash
This text of 875 F.2d 317 (Williams v. Overcash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
875 F.2d 317
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Howard WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jerry OVERCASH, City of Georgetown Police Department, James
Simmons, Margaret Bromell, Tommy Boyd, William
Fairey, Wilhelmina Izzard, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-6810.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 22, 1989.
Decided May 3, 1989.
John Howard Williams, appellant pro se.
William Walter Doar, Jr., Moore, Flowers & Doar, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
John Howard Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Overcash, C/A No. 87-83-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 6, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
875 F.2d 317, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6120, 1989 WL 50305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-overcash-ca4-1989.