Williams v. OMES Risk Management

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

GARY LEON WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-857-SLP ) OMES RISK MANAGEMENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

O R D E R

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this action pursuant to several federal statutes, including 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Chris M. Stephens pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). On November 19, 2024, Judge Stephens issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] in which he recommended the Court dismiss this action because the Second Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 13] failed to state a claim. Judge Stephens advised Plaintiff of his right to file an objection by December 10, 2024, and further advised him that failure to make timely objection waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues contained therein. [Doc. No. 14] at 8. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R. & R., nor has he requested an extension of time in which to do so. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the R. & R. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 3] is ADOPTED in its entirety, and this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13" day of December, 2024.

SCOTT L. PALK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE