Williams v. O'Brien

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 2009
Docket08-7716
StatusUnpublished

This text of Williams v. O'Brien (Williams v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. O'Brien, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7716

JAMES WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, United States Penitentiary,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00424-GEC-MFU)

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Williams v. O’Brien, No. 7:08-cv-00424-

GEC-MFU (W.D. Va. July 30, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williams v. O'Brien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-obrien-ca4-2009.