Williams v. New York City Transit Authority
This text of 90 A.D.3d 522 (Williams v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim on the Transit Authority, which was not obligated to alert her to that fact and which neither waived the defense nor is equitably estopped from raising it (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; Wollins v New York City Bd. of Educ., 8 AD3d 30, 31 [2004]; Mc-Crae v City of New York, 44 AD3d 306 [2007]; Frank v City of New York, 240 AD2d 198 [1997]).
The lease between the City and the Transit Authority establishes that the City was not responsible for maintenance of the subway station. Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Freedman, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 522, 934 N.Y.2d 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2011.