Williams v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. New York City Transit Authority

34 A.D.2d 575, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5243

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 575 (Williams v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. New York City Transit Authority, 34 A.D.2d 575, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve notices of claim, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 1969, as granted the application as to the infant petitioner, Wendell Williams. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Martuseello, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Christ, Acting P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order insofar as appealed from and to deny the application as to the infant petitioner on the basis of the views set forth in the majority memorandum in Anderson v. County of Nassau (31 A D 2d 761).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve notices of claim, the appeal, as limited by appellant’s brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 1969, as granted the application as to the infant petitioner, Wendell Williams. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Martuseello, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Christ, Acting P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to reverse the order insofar as appealed from and to deny the application as to the infant petitioner on the basis of the views set forth in the majority memorandum in Anderson v. County of Nassau (31 A D 2d 761).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 575, 310 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1970.