Williams v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

225 A.D.2d 502, 640 N.Y.2d 39, 640 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[503] Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, namely, the testimony of an inspector that he observed petitioner’s vehicle, which had a cab-like partition and three persons inside in addition to the driver, stop at a bus station, where the driver solicited a fourth passenger, and then proceed towards a subway station, and that when he stopped the vehicle the passengers in the back seat said that the driver, who they did not know personally, usually takes them to the station for a dollar. The driver’s testimony that the passengers were all friends of his who he was giving a ride to work raised an issue of credibility that was for the Administrative Law Judge to decide." We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[503] Respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, namely, the testimony of an inspector that he observed petitioner’s vehicle, which had a cab-like partition and three persons inside in addition to the driver, stop at a bus station, where the driver solicited a fourth passenger, and then proceed towards a subway station, and that when he stopped the vehicle the passengers in the back seat said that the driver, who they did not know personally, usually takes them to the station for a dollar. The driver’s testimony that the passengers were all friends of his who he was giving a ride to work raised an issue of credibility that was for the Administrative Law Judge to decide." We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Williams v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, 225 A.D.2d 502, 640 N.Y.2d 39, 640 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

225 A.D.2d 502 (Williams v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related