Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Williams v. New York City Housing Authority

Williams v. New York City Housing Authority

260 A.D.2d 279, 686 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. New York City Housing Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 A.D.2d 413 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1999·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered September 22, 1997, which, in an action for personal injuries, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for an extension of time to appear for General Municipal Law § 50-h examinations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon this record it does not appear that plaintiffs failure to comply with the stipulation was willful (see, Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51, 54; Bussing v Caligiuri, 65 AD2d 764; Cenfral Val. Concrete Corp. v Montgomery Ward & Co., 34 AD2d 860). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. New York City Housing Authority, 260 A.D.2d 279, 686 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

260 A.D.2d 279 (Williams v. New York City Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. Gold
396 N.E.2d 1029 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Central Valley Concrete Corp. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
34 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)
Bussing v. Caligiuri
65 A.D.2d 764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)