Williams v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. New York City Housing Authority

260 A.D.2d 279, 686 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 279 (Williams v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. New York City Housing Authority, 260 A.D.2d 279, 686 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered September 22, 1997, which, in an action for personal injuries, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for an extension of time to appear for General Municipal Law § 50-h examinations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon this record it does not appear that plaintiffs failure to comply with the stipulation was willful (see, Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51, 54; Bussing v Caligiuri, 65 AD2d 764; Cenfral Val. Concrete Corp. v Montgomery Ward & Co., 34 AD2d 860). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered September 22, 1997, which, in an action for personal injuries, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs cross motion for an extension of time to appear for General Municipal Law § 50-h examinations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon this record it does not appear that plaintiffs failure to comply with the stipulation was willful (see, Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51, 54; Bussing v Caligiuri, 65 AD2d 764; Cenfral Val. Concrete Corp. v Montgomery Ward & Co., 34 AD2d 860). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 279, 686 N.Y.S.2d 707, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack