Williams v. New York Central Railroad
228 A.D. 747
Opinions
Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event upon the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence on the question of negligence. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance in a memorandum. Present • — • Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. New York Central Railroad, 228 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 747 (Williams v. New York Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United Transportation Company v. . Hass
118 N.E. 1050 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Munger v. . Tonawanda Railroad Co.
4 N.Y. 349 (New York Court of Appeals, 1850)
Bisogno v. . New York Railways Company
135 N.E. 947 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Bragg v. Central New England Railway Co.
126 N.E. 253 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
United Transportation Co. v. Hass
171 A.D. 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Bisogno v. New York Railways Co.
194 A.D. 316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
United Transportation Co. v. Hass
91 Misc. 311 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)
Freeman v. United Fruit Co.
223 Mass. 300 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1916)
Westerberg v. Motor Truck Service Co.
197 N.W. 98 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)
Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.
50 L.R.A. 850 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Williams v. Kaplan
242 Ill. App. 166 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1926)
Hazle v. Southern Pac. Co.
173 F. 431 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1909)