Williams v. Nevada, State of

Opinion

* * *

Thomas L. Williams, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-00223-RFB-BNW

Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

Nevada, State of, et al.,

Defendants.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 24] of the Honorable Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered April 13, 2021. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by April 27, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. . . . ] IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 24] 1s ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED that Plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice. The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff.

DATED: October 26, 2021. Ss. Il g United States District Judge

_2-