Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
160 Misc. 2d 592, 613 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed with $10 costs.
[593] There are issues of fact which require a trial. We note that plaintiff has exclusive knowledge of the key facts while Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation’s liability is predicated on the actions of an unknown owner and operator of a hit-and-run vehicle and it must rely in large part on cross-examination of plaintiff at trial.
Scholnick, J. P., Aronin and Chetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 160 Misc. 2d 592, 613 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1994).
160 Misc. 2d 592 (Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. American Airlines, Inc.
48 V.I. 337 (Virgin Islands, 2005)