Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
This text of 160 Misc. 2d 592 (Williams v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed with $10 costs.
[593]*593There are issues of fact which require a trial. We note that plaintiff has exclusive knowledge of the key facts while Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation’s liability is predicated on the actions of an unknown owner and operator of a hit-and-run vehicle and it must rely in large part on cross-examination of plaintiff at trial.
Scholnick, J. P., Aronin and Chetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 Misc. 2d 592, 613 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-motor-vehicle-accident-indemnification-corp-nysupct-1994.