Williams v. Montgomery
This text of 58 Cal. 279 (Williams v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, alleged to have been paid by plaintiffs to and for the use and benefit of defendant, at his special instance and request. Trial by jury, and verdict for three hundred and fourteen dollars.
We have examined the transcript very carefully, and find no evidence therein to sustain the verdict. If the mortgages referred to were in any manner connected with plaintiffs’ claim, it appears from the evidence that plaintiffs received a quantity of wheat, sufficient in value to pay the indebtedness of the defendant to them. But in no view of the case is there sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the jury.
Judgment and order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 Cal. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-montgomery-cal-1881.