Williams v. Moehlman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Williams v. Moehlman

199 Ill. App. 35

DecidedApril 17, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. App. 35 (Williams v. Moehlman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Moehlman, 199 Ill. App. 35 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Appeal and error, § 1498*-—when exclusion of evidence harmless error. It is not reversible error to sustain an objection to questions asked of witnesses where the same witnesses were after-wards permitted to answer similar questions so that the evidence sought to be brought out by the questions was properly presented to the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

6. Appeal and error, § 1498*-—when exclusion of evidence harmless error. It is not reversible error to sustain an objection to questions asked of witnesses where the same witnesses were after-wards permitted to answer similar questions so that the evidence sought to be brought out by the questions was properly presented to the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ill. App. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-moehlman-illappct-1916.