Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't

551 S.W.3d 670

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 17, 2018

DocketWD 80892

StatusPublished

This text of 551 S.W.3d 670 (Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't, 551 S.W.3d 670 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kendale Williams appeals the judgment of the Boone County Court refusing to allow amendment of a petition and dismissing the petition with prejudice. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred in finding that the amended petition would not relate back to the original petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kendale Williams appeals the judgment of the Boone County Court refusing to allow amendment of a petition and dismissing the petition with prejudice. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred in finding that the amended petition would not relate back to the original petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 S.W.3d 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-mo-highways-transp-dept-moctapp-2018.