Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't

551 S.W.3d 670

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 17, 2018·No. WD 80892·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kendale Williams appeals the judgment of the Boone County Court refusing to allow amendment of a petition and dismissing the petition with prejudice. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred in finding that the amended petition would not relate back to the original petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kendale Williams appeals the judgment of the Boone County Court refusing to allow amendment of a petition and dismissing the petition with prejudice. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred in finding that the amended petition would not relate back to the original petition. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't, 551 S.W.3d 670 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

551 S.W.3d 670 (Williams v. Mo. Highways & Transp. Dep't) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.