Williams v. Miller

Connecticut Superior Court

Williams v. Miller

1 Kirby 189

DecidedNovember 15, 1786

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 189 (Williams v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Miller, 1 Kirby 189 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

Pincite

Opinion

By the whole Court.

The condition of the bond did not provide for a deputation the sheriff might make or continue at pleasure; but it counted upon, and referred to a deputation he had then in fact made, which, as appears from the pleadings, was for a limited term of six months, and it could operate no longer; and the bond was to secure against de[193]*193faults tbat might happen upon that deputation, which those-in dispute did not, but were subsequent to the expiration of said term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the whole Court.

The condition of the bond did not provide for a deputation the sheriff might make or continue at pleasure; but it counted upon, and referred to a deputation he had then in fact made, which, as appears from the pleadings, was for a limited term of six months, and it could operate no longer; and the bond was to secure against de[193]*193faults tbat might happen upon that deputation, which those-in dispute did not, but were subsequent to the expiration of said term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Kirby 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-miller-connsuperct-1786.