Williams v. Miller

1 Kirby 189
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 15, 1786·Published

Opinion

By the whole Court.

The condition of the bond did not provide for a deputation the sheriff might make or continue at pleasure; but it counted upon, and referred to a deputation he had then in fact made, which, as appears from the pleadings, was for a limited term of six months, and it could operate no longer; and the bond was to secure against de[193] faults tbat might happen upon that deputation, which those-in dispute did not, but were subsequent to the expiration of said term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Miller, 1 Kirby 189 (Colo. Ct. App. 1786).

1 Kirby 189 (Williams v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.