Williams v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Supreme Court

Williams v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

519 U.S. 1035, 117 S. Ct. 600, 65 U.S.L.W. 3415

DecidedDecember 9, 1996

DocketNo. 94-7620; No. 95-1439; No. 95-8984; No. 95-9033; No. 95-9235; No. 95-9301; No. 95-9311; No. 96-47; No. 96-218; No. 96-237; No. 96-244; No. 96-248; No. 96-258; No. 96-384; No. 96-5179; No. 96-5413; No. 96-5490; No. 96-5529; No. 96-5540; No. 96-5549; No. 96-5567; No. 96-5575; No. 96-5582; No. 96-5625; No. 96-5669; No. 96-5690; No. 96-5697; No. 96-5730; No. 96-5741; No. 96-5749; No. 96-5892; No. 96-5893; No. 96-5936; No. 96-5966; No. 96-6007

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 519 U.S. 1035 (Williams v. Metropolitan Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, 519 U.S. 1035, 117 S. Ct. 600, 65 U.S.L.W. 3415 (1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[1035]*1035514 U. S. 1006;

ante, p. 947;

ante, p. 833;

ante, p. 948;

ante, p. 806;

ante, p. 849;

ante, p. 850;

ante, p. 863;

ante, p. 871;

ante, p. 929;

ante, p. 930;

ante, p. 950;

ante, p. 884;

ante, p. 897;

ante, p. 934;

ante, p. 935;

ante, p. 904;

[1036]*1036No. 96-5625. No. 96-5669. No. 96-5690. No. 96-5697. No. 96-5730. No. 96-5741. No. 96-5749. No. 96-5892. No. 96-5893. No. 96-5936. No. 96-5966. No. 96-6007.

ante, p. 936;

ante, p. 952;

ante, p. 953;

ante, p. 908;

ante, p. 937;

ante, p. 976;

ante, p. 941;

ante, p. 954;

ante, p. 942; and

ante, p. 943. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI