Williams v. McIntyre
275 A.D.2d 792
Opinion
On the facts disclosed by the record, appellant was entitled to a dismissal of respondent’s complaint without conditions, and it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny appellant such relief. (Cf. Maraynes v. Orseck Boys, Inc., 274 App. Div. 1070; Ferber v. Newgold, 133 App. Div. 739; Tuttle v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 155 App. Div. 802.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. McIntyre, 275 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
275 A.D.2d 792 (Williams v. McIntyre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ferber v. Newgold
133 A.D. 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Tuttle v. Dubuque Fire & Marine Insurance of Dubuque
155 A.D. 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Maraynes v. Orseck Boys, Inc.
274 A.D. 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)