Williams v. McCoy

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 RONALD C. WILLIAMS, Case No. 3:22-CV-00376-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT K. MCCOY, et al., ° Defendants. 9 10 On February 9, 2024, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 48.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 49). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to April 4, 2024, to 15 | file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall 16 | be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the court 17 | for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19| DATED: — March 5, 2024. 20 .

21 UNITED STATES\MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28