Williams v. McCarthy

763 S.E.2d 748, 329 Ga. App. 85
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 18, 2014
DocketA14A0900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 763 S.E.2d 748 (Williams v. McCarthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. McCarthy, 763 S.E.2d 748, 329 Ga. App. 85 (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

We granted Christie Williams’s application for discretionary review of the trial court’s order granting Lauren McCarthy’s petition for a family violence protective order against Williams.

Following our thorough review of the case, including consideration of the complete record on appeal, we have determined that there [86]*86was no error in the trial court’s decision. The application for discretionary appeal having thus been improvidently granted, the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Collier v. Dept. of Human Resources, 196 Ga. App. 843, 844 (397 SE2d 632) (1990) (dismissing discretionary appeal as improvidently granted where full consideration of record revealed no error in lower court’s ruling).

Decided September 18, 2014. Nathaniel M. Smith, for appellant. Lauren McCarthy, pro se.

Appeal dismissed.

Doyle, P. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 S.E.2d 748, 329 Ga. App. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-mccarthy-gactapp-2014.