Williams v. Maden

New York Supreme Court

Williams v. Maden

9 Wend. 240

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1832

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 Wend. 240 (Williams v. Maden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Maden, 9 Wend. 240 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

There is But one breach assigned, and that is the revocation of the powers of the arbitrators, which is a good breach and well assigned. If the plaintiff has specified items of damage which he is not entitled to recover, the question whether he is entitled to recover them [241]*241will properly arise on the trial of the cause. The plaintiff is entitled to judgment, with leave to the defendant to plead on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

There is But one breach assigned, and that is the revocation of the powers of the arbitrators, which is a good breach and well assigned. If the plaintiff has specified items of damage which he is not entitled to recover, the question whether he is entitled to recover them [241]*241will properly arise on the trial of the cause. The plaintiff is entitled to judgment, with leave to the defendant to plead on payment of costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Wend. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-maden-nysupct-1832.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack