Williams v. Lewis

2 Stew. 41
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 15, 1829·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By CHIEF JUSTICE LIPSCOMB.

The names of the particular defendants who waived their plea are'not given, nor is the plea itself set out. If there had been a general appearance for all the defendants, they would have been estopped from saying the writ had not been executed. It would be presuming too much, to say that this record shewed that Charles L. Mitchell had appeared by his attorney; there were two defendants in Court, and the record may be strictly true without his appearance, by himself or attorney. The judgment was improperly rendered against Charles Mitchell, and it is also erroneous as to the others; there being no discontinuance entered as to the defendant not served with process.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Lewis, 2 Stew. 41 (Ala. 1829).

2 Stew. 41 (Williams v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ladiga Saw-Mill Co. v. Smith
78 Ala. 108 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Daniel v. Stough
73 Ala. 379 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)
Holly v. Bass' Adm'r
63 Ala. 387 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1879)
Hunt's Heirs v. Ellison's Heirs
32 Ala. 173 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
McElhaney v. Gilleland
30 Ala. 183 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)