Williams v. Leonardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Leonardo

198 A.D.2d 582, 604 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 582 (Williams v. Leonardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Leonardo, 198 A.D.2d 582, 604 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The determination finding petitioner guilty of possession of controlled substances and possession of property in an unauthorized area was supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed. Contrary to petitioner’s argument, there was nothing improper about the misbehavior report. Moreover, even if petitioner had succeeded in preserving for appellate review his claims that respondent’s employees failed to follow proper drug test and cell search procedures, we would nevertheless conclude that these claims were without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, [583]*583JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The determination finding petitioner guilty of possession of controlled substances and possession of property in an unauthorized area was supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed. Contrary to petitioner’s argument, there was nothing improper about the misbehavior report. Moreover, even if petitioner had succeeded in preserving for appellate review his claims that respondent’s employees failed to follow proper drug test and cell search procedures, we would nevertheless conclude that these claims were without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Cardona, [583]*583JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 582, 604 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-leonardo-nyappdiv-1993.