Williams v. Lebeau
This text of 988 So. 2d 1276 (Williams v. Lebeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darryl WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
Nancy LEBEAU, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Robert L. Sirianni, Jr., of Brownstone, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.
Nancy Lebeau, St. Cloud, Pro Se.
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Williams appeals an injunction for protection entered against him. We reverse.
Because of a technical problem with the trial court's digital recording equipment, a significant portion of the evidence was not recorded. As a result, through no fault of the parties, the transcript of the proceedings is incomplete. Unfortunately, the missing portions of the transcript are necessary *1277 for a complete review of the issues raised on appeal.[1] As a result, we have no alternative but to remand this matter for a new hearing. See Jones v. State, 780 So.2d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
PLEUS, ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] The parties were unable to agree on a statement of the evidence, as authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4). Additionally, the trial judge was unable to recollect the evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
988 So. 2d 1276, 2008 WL 3978125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-lebeau-fladistctapp-2008.