Williams v. Law & Schriener, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. Law & Schriener, LLC

520 S.W.3d 518, 2017 WL 2544288, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 565

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2017·No. No. ED 104927·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Ernest Williams (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City dismissing his petition without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by dismissing his petition because he alleged sufficient facts to establish claims for legal malpractice, negligence, and constructive fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Ernest Williams (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis City dismissing his petition without prejudice for failure to state a claim. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by dismissing his petition because he alleged sufficient facts to establish claims for legal malpractice, negligence, and constructive fraud. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Williams v. Law & Schriener, LLC, 520 S.W.3d 518, 2017 WL 2544288, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 565 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

520 S.W.3d 518 (Williams v. Law & Schriener, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.