Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC

518 F. App'x 180

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 2013

DocketNo. 12-2368

StatusPublished

This text of 518 F. App'x 180 (Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC, 518 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donte R. Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC, No. 12-3050, 2012 WL 5266122 (Oct. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donte R. Williams appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Law Office of John W. Conrad III, LLC, No. 12-3050, 2012 WL 5266122 (Oct. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-law-office-of-john-w-conrad-iii-llc-ca4-2013.