Williams v. Landon

336 S.E.2d 907, 1 Va. App. 206, 1985 Va. App. LEXIS 86
CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedNovember 19, 1985
DocketRecord No. 0142-85
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 336 S.E.2d 907 (Williams v. Landon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Landon, 336 S.E.2d 907, 1 Va. App. 206, 1985 Va. App. LEXIS 86 (Va. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Opinion

MOON, J.

Appellant, Frank Williams, appeals pro se from a decision of the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond dismissing his habeas corpus petition pursuant to Code § 8.01-654(B)(2) on the ground that the allegation of facts upon which petitioner relied were known to him when he filed previous petitions. The Commonwealth claims the appeal must be dismissed because Williams failed to timely file the notice of appeal in accordance with our rules. We agree.

Williams’ petition was dismissed in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond on November 29, 1984. Williams filed his notice of appeal dated January 5, 1985, with the Circuit Court Clerk for the City of Richmond on January 8, 1985. A copy of that notice was not filed with the clerk of the Court of Appeals until February 4, 1985. Rule 5A:6(a) provides:

No appeal shall be allowed unless, within 30 days after entry of final judgment or other appealable order or decree, counsel files with the clerk of the trial court a notice of appeal, and at the same time mails or delivers a copy of such notice to all opposing counsel and the clerk of the Court of Appeals.

Rule 5A:3 provides: “The times prescribed for filing the notice of appeal (Rule 5A:6. . .). . .are mandatory.”

Habeas corpus petitioners must follow the rules of court just as all other parties desiring an appeal. Meade v. Cox, 310 F. Supp. 233, 239 (W.D. Va. 1970), aff'd, 438 F.2d 323 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 910 (1971). Therefore, for failure to timely *208 file the notice of appeal, the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Duff, J., and Hodges, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert Edward Woody v. County of Amherst
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2010
Watkins v. Fairfax County Department of Family Services
595 S.E.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2004)
Zion Church Designers & Builders v. McDonald
445 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1994)
D'Alessandro v. Commonwealth
423 S.E.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1992)
Sanchez v. Commonwealth
14 Va. App. 256 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1992)
Turner v. Commonwealth
341 S.E.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1986)
Johnson v. Commonwealth
339 S.E.2d 919 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
336 S.E.2d 907, 1 Va. App. 206, 1985 Va. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-landon-vactapp-1985.