Williams v. Ketchum

19 Wis. 231
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

DOWNER, J.

Is there a consideration expressed in the written memorandum set out in the complaint, so as to make it a valid agreement, within the statute of frauds ? The memorandum is as follows: “ I will be responsible for the purchase of goods from Williams, Smith & Co., for A. C. Dougherty or by his order, until I give them notice to the contrary. Chicago, October 9, 1860. (Signed) H. Ketchum.” This is equivalent to saying, if you will sell Dougherty goods, in consideration thereof, I will be responsible for the amount of the sales until notice to the contrary. It has been uniformly held that such memorandums relating to future sales, do express, not in so many words, but as gathered from the whole instrument, the consideration, and are valid. This answers, in substance, all the objections to the complaint.

Order of the court below affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Ketchum, 19 Wis. 231 (Wis. 1865).

19 Wis. 231 (Williams v. Ketchum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oregon Home Builders v. Crowley
170 P. 718 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1918)
Drovers' Deposit National Bank v. Tichenor
145 N.W. 777 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)
Miami County National Bank v. Goldberg
113 N.W. 391 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Coxe Bros. & Co. v. Milbrath
86 N.W. 174 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1901)