Williams v. Kelly Services, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Williams v. Kelly Services, Inc.

388 S.W.3d 178, 2012 WL 943890, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 372

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2012·No. No. ED 97010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Rosiemary Williams appeals from a judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying her unemployment benefits because she voluntarily quit her job without good cause attributable to the employer. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the order of the Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Rosiemary Williams appeals from a judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the Commission) denying her unemployment benefits because she voluntarily quit her job without good cause attributable to the employer. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the order of the Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Mo. R. Civ. P. (2011).

Williams v. Kelly Services, Inc., 388 S.W.3d 178, 2012 WL 943890, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 372 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 178 (Williams v. Kelly Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.