Williams v. Kavanaugh

Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Kavanaugh

34 F. App'x 952

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 23, 2002

DocketNo. 02-6131

StatusPublished

This text of 34 F. App'x 952 (Williams v. Kavanaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Kavanaugh, 34 F. App'x 952 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Kavanaugh, No. CA-01-474-AMD (D.Md. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scotland E. Williams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1988 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Kavanaugh, No. CA-01-474-AMD (D.Md. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 F. App'x 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-kavanaugh-ca4-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack