Williams v. Johnson

60 F. App'x 998
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 F. App'x 1
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2003·No. No. 03-6326·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Clifton N. Williams appeals the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation from which Williams appeals does not constitute an order over which this court may exercise jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Johnson, 60 F. App'x 998 (4th Cir. 2003).

60 F. App'x 998 (Williams v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)