Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.
19 Misc. 2d 782, 195 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2977
Opinion
Plaintiffs failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that they have a meritorious cause of action. (Lunghino v. Marine Trust Co. of Buffalo, 163 Misc. 765; Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.)
The order should be unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to defendant and motion to open plaintiffs’ default and to restore case to calendar denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.
Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co., 19 Misc. 2d 782, 195 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).
19 Misc. 2d 782 (Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rothschild v. Haviland
172 A.D. 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Lunghino v. Marine Trust Co.
163 Misc. 765 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)