Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.

19 Misc. 2d 782, 195 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2977

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Misc. 2d 782 (Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Jarnot Ardisson Co., 19 Misc. 2d 782, 195 N.Y.S.2d 847, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs failed to submit an affidavit factually sufficient to show that they have a meritorious cause of action. (Lunghino v. Marine Trust Co. of Buffalo, 163 Misc. 765; Rothschild v. Haviland, 172 App. Div. 562.)

The order should be unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements to defendant and motion to open plaintiffs’ default and to restore case to calendar denied with leave to renew upon proper papers.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI