Williams v. Huey

263 Ill. 275
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 23, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 263 Ill. 275 (Williams v. Huey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Huey, 263 Ill. 275 (Ill. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Chiee Justice Cooke

delivered the opinion of the court:

On March 27, 1912, Frank M. Williams, individually and as guardian of Claude Raymond Williams, and Anna Huey Williams, filed their bill for partition in the circuit court of Alexander county. A guardian ad litem was appointed for certain infant defendants, and the • guardian ad litem demurred to the bill. The demurrer was sustained, and the complainants having elected to stand by their bill, a decree was entered “that the said defendants have and recover of and from the complainant herein their costs in this behalf expended, and that in default of payment execution issue therefor; to which judgment the complainants except and pray an appeal, * * * and this cause is continued generally.” This was the only order or decree entered. It did not dismiss the bill or otherwise finally dispose of the cause, but, on the contrary, the cause was continued. This writ of error has been sued out to review this decree.

An order sustaining a demurrer, although it adjudges costs, is not a final decree. As the statute only authorizes final judgments or decrees to be reviewed by appeal or writ of error this court has no jurisdiction of the cause and will dismiss the writ of error of its own motion. Chicago Portrait Co. v. Crayon Co. 217 Ill. 200; County of Franklin v. Blake, 257 id. 354.

The writ of error is dismissed.

WHf dismissed_

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PEO. EX REL. POLLUTION CONTROL BD. v. Fry Roofing
281 N.E.2d 757 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1972)
People ex rel. Pollution Control Board v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.
281 N.E.2d 757 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1972)
Chicago Housing Authority v. Abrams
99 N.E.2d 129 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1951)
Gould v. Klabunde
63 N.E.2d 258 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1945)
Winger v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.
60 N.E.2d 560 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1945)
Board of Education v. Board of Education
22 N.E.2d 400 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1939)
Wiggins v. Union Trust Co.
266 Ill. App. 560 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1932)
Miller v. Bunn
168 N.E. 303 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1929)
Bushman v. Fraser
149 N.E. 779 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)
Barber v. Wood
149 N.E. 231 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)
Trebbin v. Thoeresz
146 N.E. 542 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 Ill. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-huey-ill-1914.