Williams v. Howard Cole & Co.

31 So. 2d 914, 159 Fla. 151, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 744
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 25, 1947·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

This is the second appearance of this cause here on petition for certiorari. See Howard Cole Company, Inc., et al. v. Williams, et al., 157 Fla. 851, 27 So.2d 352.

The chronology of the matters pertinent to the present disposition is set out in an opinion by Mr. Justice BARNS, concurred in by Mr. Chief Justice THOMAS, which will be filed herewith.

The majority of the court cannot agree with the deductions stated and the conclusions reached in the Barns opinion.

We think that the bill of complaint as amended by the second proposed amendment will not be without equity and, therefore, that the requested leave to so amend should have been granted and an order entered requiring defendants to answer within a stated time and that thereafter testimony should be taken so that the court may fully determine the equities, rights and liabilities of the respective parties.

Certiorari is granted under Rule 34.

The order denying leave to file second amendment to the bill of complaint and dismissing the amended bill of complaint is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

So ordered.

TERRELL, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

THOMAS, C. J., and BARNS, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Howard Cole & Co., 31 So. 2d 914, 159 Fla. 151, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 744 (Fla. 1947).

31 So. 2d 914 (Williams v. Howard Cole & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Estate of Feldmann
224 So. 2d 715 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Williams v. Howard Cole Company
38 So. 2d 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)