Williams v. Holmes & Provost
7 Wis. 168
Opinion
By the Court,
The judgment of the court below must be affirmed. In Kavanaugh vs. Titus, 5 Wis. Rep., 143, and in several other cases, we have held that motions made in the progress of a cause are not part of the record, and can only be made so by bill of exceptions, duly settled. There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and hence the motion and ruling of the court below are not properly before us.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Holmes & Provost, 7 Wis. 168 (Wis. 1859).
7 Wis. 168 (Williams v. Holmes & Provost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wisconsin Face & Fire Brick Co. v. Southern Surety Co.
206 N.W. 204 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1925)
Schomberg v. Long
108 N.W. 332 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1906)
Dow v. Deissner
80 N.W. 940 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
Mooney v. Donovan
81 N.W. 50 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1899)
Teweles v. Lins
74 N.W. 122 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
Donkle v. Milem
59 N.W. 586 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1894)