Williams v. Holmes & Provost

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Williams v. Holmes & Provost

7 Wis. 168

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 7 Wis. 168 (Williams v. Holmes & Provost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Holmes & Provost, 7 Wis. 168 (Wis. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Smith J.

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed. In Kavanaugh vs. Titus, 5 Wis. Rep., 143, and in several other cases, we have held that motions made in the progress of a cause are not part of the record, and can only be made so by bill of exceptions, duly settled. There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and hence the motion and ruling of the court below are not properly before us.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Smith J.

The judgment of the court below must be affirmed. In Kavanaugh vs. Titus, 5 Wis. Rep., 143, and in several other cases, we have held that motions made in the progress of a cause are not part of the record, and can only be made so by bill of exceptions, duly settled. There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and hence the motion and ruling of the court below are not properly before us.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Wis. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-holmes-provost-wis-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack