Williams v. Hogeboom
22 Wend. 648
Opinion
By the Court,
The statute referred to does not affect any suit or proceeding commenced before the act took ^effect § 38, and consequently the objection that there was not sufficient time between the teste and return of the execution, is not well taken. This point was decided at the last motion term.
Although tested on Sunday, the writ was not absolutely void, and the plaintiff may amend on paying the costs of this motion.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. Hogeboom, 22 Wend. 648 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1840).
22 Wend. 648 (Williams v. Hogeboom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woolworth v. Taylor
62 How. Pr. 90 (New York Marine Court, 1881)
Leetch v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance
4 Daly 518 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1873)