Williams v. Hogeboom

New York Supreme Court

Williams v. Hogeboom

22 Wend. 648

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1840

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 Wend. 648 (Williams v. Hogeboom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Hogeboom, 22 Wend. 648 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1840).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The statute referred to does not affect any suit or proceeding commenced before the act took ^effect § 38, and consequently the objection that there was not sufficient time between the teste and return of the execution, is not well taken. This point was decided at the last motion term.

Although tested on Sunday, the writ was not absolutely void, and the plaintiff may amend on paying the costs of this motion.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The statute referred to does not affect any suit or proceeding commenced before the act took ^effect § 38, and consequently the objection that there was not sufficient time between the teste and return of the execution, is not well taken. This point was decided at the last motion term.

Although tested on Sunday, the writ was not absolutely void, and the plaintiff may amend on paying the costs of this motion.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Wend. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-hogeboom-nysupct-1840.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack