Williams v. Hinson
This text of 85 S.E. 868 (Williams v. Hinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff filed a petition to enjoin the enforcement of an execution issued from a justice’s court, contending that the execution and the judgment upon which it was based were void, because the judgment was rendered by the justice at a time when the court could not legally be held, inasmuch as another date had properly, and in accordance with the statute, been fixed and appointed for the holding of the court. The petition, at the appearance term of the superior court, was dismissed upon demurrer. Meld: Without discussing the question as to whether or not the judgment was void as contended by petitioner, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition. If the execution and judgment referred to were void for the reasons assigned, the petitioner had an adequate remedy at law; for he could have resisted the enforcement of the execution by filing an affidavit of illegality. Planters Loan and Savings Bank v. Berry, 91 Ga. 264 (18 S. E. 137) ; Hilson v. Kitchens, 107 Ga. 230 (33 S. E. 71, 73 Am. St. R. 119) ; Harbig v. Freund, 69 Ga. 180.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 868, 143 Ga. 740, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-hinson-ga-1915.