Williams v. Hays
This text of 5 N.Y.S. 667 (Williams v. Hays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decision upon the appeal by the plaintiff from an order permitting the appellant to file a supplemental answer, (ante, 666,) alleging the result of the trial in the superior court of the city of Yew York in the case of Hays against the Phoenix Insurance Company, practically decides this. [668]*668motion also. That portion of the order not appealed from granted a stay pending this appeal, and properly denied a stay until the hearing upon appeal of the ease pending in the superior court of the city of New York in the action brought by this defendant against the insurance company. Such stay was obviously all the court should have granted, and the discretion of the court seems to have been fairly exercised, .and should not be disturbed. Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.
Van Brunt, P. J., and Bartlett, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.Y.S. 667, 2 Silv. Sup. 355, 24 N.Y. St. Rep. 683, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-hays-nysupct-1889.