Williams v. Haycraft

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Williams v. Haycraft

1912 OK 669, 127 P. 494, 33 Okla. 697, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 777

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 22, 1912

Docket1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1912 OK 669 (Williams v. Haycraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Haycraft, 1912 OK 669, 127 P. 494, 33 Okla. 697, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 777 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

TURNER, C. J.

On June 7, 1909, W. T.' Hayeraft, defendant in error, sued Isham Williams, plaintiff in error, in the district court of Choctaw county in damages for slander. After answer filed, there was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here.

For the reason that plaintiff in error has failed in his three-page brief to comply with any of the rules of this court, and nowhere in his brief has raised a question of law, this proceeding is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TURNER, C. J.

On June 7, 1909, W. T.' Hayeraft, defendant in error, sued Isham Williams, plaintiff in error, in the district court of Choctaw county in damages for slander. After answer filed, there was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here.

For the reason that plaintiff in error has failed in his three-page brief to comply with any of the rules of this court, and nowhere in his brief has raised a question of law, this proceeding is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK 669, 127 P. 494, 33 Okla. 697, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-haycraft-okla-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack