Williams v. Hawkins

372 So. 2d 1010, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 1979·No. No. 78-1204·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

DAUKSCH, Judge.

There is a genuine issue of material fact which was improperly decided by summary judgment in this case. The lawsuit is centered around whether a license fee the county would impose by ordinance was in fact an illegal tax. If the license fee was unconnected with the cost of regulating the utilities which would pay the fee then it is a tax and illegal. Bateman v. City of Winter Park et al. 37 So.2d 362 (Fla.1948); Broward County v. Janis Development Corp., 311 So.2d 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). While it may appear from the pleadings the fee was a tax there is no evidence to support such a conclusion and a trial of the matter may reveal otherwise. The motion and order for summary judgment are totally unsupported by testimony, by affidavit or otherwise, and the only evidence in our record is the ordinance itself. The error is in granting a summary judgment without an evidentiary foundation to support it. It is not a question of whether or not the fee was a tax. That question cannot be decided by a review of the ordinance and the pleadings. There must be evidence to support the proposition the fee was in fact a tax. Perhaps affidavits and depositions may support a similar summary judgment later but there are none of record yet. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, C. J., concurs. LETTS, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Hawkins, 372 So. 2d 1010, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

372 So. 2d 1010 (Williams v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Brigham City
856 P.2d 347 (Utah Supreme Court, 1993)