Williams v. Harris

District Court, S.D. Georgia·Decided October 18, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-00165·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

AUGUSTA DIVISION

JEREMY NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 119-165 ) LATASHA HARRIS and WARDEN ) EDWARD PAILBEN, ) ) Defendants. ) _________

O R D E R _________

Let a copy of this Report and Recommendation be served upon counsel for the parties. Any party who objects to this Report and Recommendation or anything in it must file, not later than November 4, 2019, written objections specifically identifying the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made and the specific basis for objection.1 The Clerk will submit this Report and Recommendation together with any objections to Chief United States District Judge J. Randal Hall, on November 5, 2019. Failure to file specific objections within the specified time means that this Report and Recommendation may become the opinion and order of the Court, Devine v. Prison Health Servs., Inc., 212 F. App’x 890, 892 (11th Cir. 2006), and may limit a party’s appellate rights. Dupree v. Warden, 715 F.3d 1295, 1300 (11th Cir. 2013). Requests for extension of time to file objections to this Report and Recommendation

1A copy of the objections must be served upon all other parties to the action. shall be filed with the Clerk of Court for consideration by the undersigned. A party may not appeal a Magistrate Judge’s recommendation directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Appeals may be made only from a final judgment entered by the District Judge. SO ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2019, at Augusta, Georgia.

BRIAN K. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Harris, (S.D. Ga. 2019).

Williams v. Harris (Williams v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Debbie Devine v. Prison Health Services, Inc.
212 F. App'x 890 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)