Williams v. Harriott
180 A. 851, 115 N.J.L. 497, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 322
This text of 180 A. 851 (Williams v. Harriott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williams v. Harriott, 180 A. 851, 115 N.J.L. 497, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1935).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance —The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Sutkus
182 A. 15 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 A. 851, 115 N.J.L. 497, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-harriott-nj-1935.