Williams v. Harriott

180 A. 851, 115 N.J.L. 497, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 322

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Harriott, 180 A. 851, 115 N.J.L. 497, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 322 (N.J. 1935).

Pincite

180 A. 851 (Williams v. Harriott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.