Williams v. Harmanson

41 La. Ann. 702
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1889
DocketNo. 1,337
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 41 La. Ann. 702 (Williams v. Harmanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Harmanson, 41 La. Ann. 702 (La. 1889).

Opinions

Tlie opinion of tlie Court was delivered by

Fenner, J.

Tlie motion to dismiss this appeal lias no merit. Tlie record clearly establishes that the appellants made due and formal application for an order of appeal which was duly granted. The clerk having failed to enter the order oh his minutes, application was made to the judge, on notice to the appellees, to have tlie minptes corrected and the entiy of the order incorporated .therein, which application was granted by the judge.

As tlie order had been granted on the last day of term, application was properly made to the judge at chambers, and lie had the right there, on proper proof of error, to cause his minutes to he corrected so as to conform to the facts. The order as thus entered Axes the return day and complies with all requirements.

The suggestion that the amount in dispute is not within our jurisdiction, is equally unfounded. The claim is for restoration to possession [704]*704of a farm and for damages for unlawful dispossession in tlie sum of over $5000. Tlie latter chain may be excessive, but it is serious, an’d not, in any sense, so fictitious as to authorize a dismissal of the appeal in a case in which defendants would have clearly had the right to appeal to this court., had judgment gone against them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LaFleur v. Sylvester
135 So. 2d 91 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)
Loeblich v. Garnier
113 So. 2d 95 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
Breaux v. City of Sulphur
85 So. 2d 723 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1956)
Dixon v. Zemurray
82 So. 2d 281 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)
Bossier Enterprises, Inc. v. Carbone
66 So. 2d 521 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)
Miller v. Welsh
66 So. 2d 25 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)
Morgan v. Patin
47 So. 2d 91 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1950)
Efner v. Ketteringham
47 So. 2d 331 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
Rhodes v. Collier
41 So. 2d 669 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1949)
Efner v. Ketteringham
41 So. 2d 130 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Encalade v. Cheramie
24 So. 2d 830 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1946)
De Graauw v. Eleazar
24 So. 2d 180 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1945)
Cutrer v. Spring
4 So. 2d 106 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1941)
Annison v. Womack
200 So. 663 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1941)
Fitzsimmons v. Cassity
172 So. 824 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Union Methodist Episcopal Chapel v. Rupp
170 So. 508 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Bruning v. City of New Orleans
115 So. 733 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Frazier v. Board of Directors
97 So. 199 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)
Brewster v. Hewes
36 So. 883 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 La. Ann. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-harmanson-la-1889.