Williams v. H. C. Speer & Sons Co.
287 U.S. 562, 53 S. Ct. 5
Opinion
The appeal' herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179, 181; Jett Bros. Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 6, 7; Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99, 106; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 116, 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williams v. H. C. Speer & Sons Co., 287 U.S. 562, 53 S. Ct. 5 (1932).
287 U.S. 562 (Williams v. H. C. Speer & Sons Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
251 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Citizens Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. Durr
257 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
261 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad Commission
269 U.S. 354 (Supreme Court, 1926)