Williams v. Gresham
This text of 151 S.E. 532 (Williams v. Gresham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of a certain excerpt from the charge of the court, is without merit. The excerpt, when considered in the light of the charge as a whole, could not have misled the jury, and it does not require another hearing of the ease.
2. The remaining special grounds of the motion are not complete and understandable within themselves. In order to ascertain whether error were shown by any of those grounds, this court would be compelled to refer to the brief of the evidence.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E. 532, 40 Ga. App. 715, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-gresham-gactapp-1930.