Williams v. Greene
This text of 56 Mass. 465 (Williams v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The wife of Millard was a good witness.' Millard himself was a competent witness. The real question in issue was, whether the officer had a right to attach and hold the property for creditors, at the time of the attachment [467]*467and it was no answer, that the attachments had been dissolved, at the time of the trial. At present, there is nothing on the record, entitling the defendant to a return. If a suggestion is made for that purpose, it must be considered on its merits. The exceptions are overruled; and, it appearing to the court that they are frivolous, the defendant is entitled to iudgment for double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Mass. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-greene-mass-1848.