Williams v. Greadington

410 So. 2d 644, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19382
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 1982·No. No. AI-322·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This petition for writ of mandamus is brought as a class action, asking this Court to order respondent Florida Parole and Probation Commission (Commission) to send its notices and orders by U. S. Mail, because some prisoners allegedly do not receive notification of final agency action until the time for filing a notice of appeal1 has passed. We deny that request, finding that notices and orders of Commission action are sent by U. S. Mail2 and that, absent exceptional circumstances,3 Commission mail is received by inmates in sufficient time to file a notice of appeal in this Court.4

It is not the function of this Court to instruct the Commission on how to handle mail service, but we will be vigilant to insure that prisoners’ basic right to appeal is not infringed by failure of the prison system to deliver mail. No substantial deprivation of this right occurred in the examples presented in this case.5 Petitioner has not alleged facts indicating any relief is due; therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Greadington, 410 So. 2d 644, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19382 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

410 So. 2d 644 (Williams v. Greadington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duarte v. RMC South Florida, Inc.
973 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)