Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
This text of 1996 Ohio 278 (Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1283.]
WILLIAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996-Ohio-278.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1501—Submitted November 7, 1995—Decided January 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APE12-1735. __________________ Scott E. Smith Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Smith, for appellants. Lane, Alton & Horst, Rick E. Marsh and William Scott Lavelle for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1996 Ohio 278, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-grange-mut-cas-co-ohio-1996.