Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

1996 Ohio 278, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1283
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 1996·No. 1994-1501·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 1283.]

WILLIAMS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996-Ohio-278.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 94-1501—Submitted November 7, 1995—Decided January 31, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93APE12-1735. __________________ Scott E. Smith Co., L.P.A., and Scott E. Smith, for appellants. Lane, Alton & Horst, Rick E. Marsh and William Scott Lavelle for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and WRIGHT, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 1996 Ohio 278, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1283 (Ohio 1996).

1996 Ohio 278 (Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leon v. Cuyahoga County Ct. of Common Pleas, 92826 (3-27-2009)
2009 Ohio 1612 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Stewart v. State, 92515 (2-4-2009)
2009 Ohio 482 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
State Ex Rel. Rose v. McGinty, 92578 (2-2-2009)
2009 Ohio 458 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Strauss v. Celebrezze, 92369 (1-27-2009)
2009 Ohio 370 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)
Wanamaker v. Davis, 2005-Ca-151 (8-24-2007)
2007 Ohio 4340 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)