Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

92 So. 471, 207 Ala. 335, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 68
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 20, 1922
Docket7 Div. 291.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 92 So. 471 (Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 92 So. 471, 207 Ala. 335, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 68 (Ala. 1922).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case was rendered June 20, 1921, and the bill of exceptions was presented to the presiding judge September 21, 1921, not within 90 days, as is required by section 3019 of the Code of 1907. It is essential to the jurisdiction of this court to consider a bill of exceptions that it discloses a compliance with this mandatory provision, and, failing to do so, the same will not be considered, notwithstanding no motion is made to strike same. Wrenn v. Baker, 15 Ala. App. 434, 73 South. 756, and cases there cited. As the bill of exceptions cannot be considered, and there being no assignment of error relating to the record proper, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARD1-NER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bear Bros.
51 So. 2d 263 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Clark v. Henderson
12 So. 2d 743 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Lewis v. Martin
98 So. 635 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 So. 471, 207 Ala. 335, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-goodyear-tire-rubber-co-ala-1922.