Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

92 So. 471, 207 Ala. 335, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 68
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 20, 1922·No. 7 Div. 291.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case was rendered June 20, 1921, and the bill of exceptions was presented to the presiding judge September 21, 1921, not within 90 days, as is required by section 3019 of the Code of 1907. It is essential to the jurisdiction of this court to consider a bill of exceptions that it discloses a compliance with this mandatory provision, and, failing to do so, the same will not be considered, notwithstanding no motion is made to strike same. Wrenn v. Baker, 15 Ala. App. 434, 73 South. 756, and cases there cited. As the bill of exceptions cannot be considered, and there being no assignment of error relating to the record proper, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, GARD1-NER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 92 So. 471, 207 Ala. 335, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 68 (Ala. 1922).

92 So. 471 (Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bear Bros.
51 So. 2d 263 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Clark v. Henderson
12 So. 2d 743 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Lewis v. Martin
98 So. 635 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)