Williams v. Glazebrook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Williams v. Glazebrook

9 Ky. Op. 390, 1877 Ky. LEXIS 232

DecidedMarch 9, 1877

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ky. Op. 390 (Williams v. Glazebrook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Glazebrook, 9 Ky. Op. 390, 1877 Ky. LEXIS 232 (Ky. Ct. App. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The evidence as to the value of maintaining Mrs. Williams was quite conflicting, and we cannot say that it did not authorize the allowance made to the appellee on the account.

The settlement made with the county judge of the appellee’s accounts as guardian of Sarah E. Lanham, although not formally approved, was ordered to record and is prima facie correct, and as no specific objections to it were pointed out in the petition no case was or could be made out for correcting it if wrong.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The evidence as to the value of maintaining Mrs. Williams was quite conflicting, and we cannot say that it did not authorize the allowance made to the appellee on the account.

The settlement made with the county judge of the appellee’s accounts as guardian of Sarah E. Lanham, although not formally approved, was ordered to record and is prima facie correct, and as no specific objections to it were pointed out in the petition no case was or could be made out for correcting it if wrong.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Ky. Op. 390, 1877 Ky. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-glazebrook-kyctapp-1877.